Wiki+page+rubrics-content+and+comments


 * Wiki Page Creation Rubric**
 * || **Exemplary** |||| **Proficient** || **Developing** |||| **Emerging** || **Insufficient evidence** ||
 * **Content** || Covers all the necessary content in a concise form and includes a glossary of key terminology. |||| Covers most of the required content but with some obvious omissions and uses too many words. No glossary of terms. || Unfocused, lacking in detail (or far too much detail) and irrelevant at times. |||| Totally Inadequate ||  ||
 * **Presentation and Formatting** || Content is easy to understand, intuitive and visually appealing |||| An attempt has been made to make this page well structured but it has some obvious weaknesses || Little care has been taken over the formatting and presentation of this page |||| Info very disorganized ||  ||
 * **Use of Media** || Various forms of media (pictures, text, video, audio, maps, graphs etc) have been used in appropriate and meaningful ways |||| Media used without a clear purpose or with obvious omissions || Limited and unimaginative use of media |||| Only text ||  ||
 * **Usability** || This is much more useful than my own notes would be |||| About as good as my own notes are or would be || My own notes and the text book are more useful |||| Unlikely to use for any reason ||  ||
 * **Reflection and Review** || The page manager is an active participant in the discussion thread, demonstrating careful consideration of suggestions and advice offered and has incorporated others ideas into the page successfully || The page manager has been involved in discussions and has made changes accordingly although they are not always successfully incorporated. |||| An attempt has been made to incorporate others ideas but it has missed the point. Little or no involvement in the comment thread. || Superficial comments and or changes made ||

**Wiki Comment Rubric**

 * || **Exemplary** || **Proficient** || **Developing** || **Emerging** || **Insufficient evidence** ||
 * **Interpretation** || A thorough understanding of the page is demonstrated || A good understanding of most concepts is demonstrated || An understanding of the basic concepts on the page is evident || Very little understanding of the page content demonstrated ||  ||
 * **Diplomacy** || Comment is very likely to be well received || Comment is unlikely to provoke a negative reaction || Comment might be misconstrued as antagonistic || Comment is likely to arouse annoyance ||  ||
 * **Specific** || Comment is specific. It gives examples of good and bad points on the page and explains why they think so. Solid recommendations for improvements given || Comment is specific. It gives examples of good and bad points and explains why they think so. || Comment is vague and or over generalized || Comment is vague ||  ||
 * **Advice/Thought Provoking** || Comment is almost certainly going to lead to an improvement to the page || Comment is likely to lead to positive changes on the page || Comment could be useful if it was clarified || Comment offers little of use ||  ||

[]